↓ Skip to main content

Network Analysis as an Alternative Approach to Conceptualizing Eating Disorders: Implications for Research and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Network Analysis as an Alternative Approach to Conceptualizing Eating Disorders: Implications for Research and Treatment
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11920-018-0930-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheri A. Levinson, Irina A. Vanzhula, Leigh C. Brosof, Kelsie Forbush

Abstract

Network analysis (NA) is an emerging methodology that allows for the characterization of maintaining symptoms and pathways among symptoms of mental disorders. The current paper provides background on NA and discusses the relevance of the network approach for the conceptualization of eating disorders (ED). We review the burgeoning literature conceptualizing ED from a network approach. Overall, these papers find that fear of weight gain and overvaluation of weight and shape are core symptoms in networks of ED pathology. We integrate literature on new advances in network methodology (e.g., within-person NA) and the clinical relevance of these approaches for the ED field (e.g., personalized ED treatment). We also provide several considerations (e.g., replicability, sample size, and node (item) selection) for researchers who are interested in using network science and recommend several emerging "best practices" for NA. Finally, we highlight novel applications of NA, specifically the ability to identify within-person maintaining symptoms, and the potential treatment implications for ED that network methods may hold. Overall, NA is a new methodology that holds significant promise for new treatment development in the ED field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 24 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 33 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,540,135
of 23,845,863 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#637
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,530
of 332,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#24
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,845,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.