↓ Skip to main content

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: results of a comparative cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,364)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
89 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: results of a comparative cohort study
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10151-018-1832-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Mizrahi, M. Abu-Gazala, A. S. Rickles, L. M. Fernandez, A. Petrucci, J. Wolf, D. R. Sands, S. D. Wexner

Abstract

Anastomotic leak (AL) after low anterior resection (LAR) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, cost and cancer recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of fluorescence angiography (FA) on AL following LAR for low rectal cancer. This is a single surgeon retrospective cohort study with a historical, consecutively sampled case matched control group. The institution's prospectively maintained institutional review board (IRB)-approved database was queried for all patients who underwent a laparoscopic LAR for rectal neoplasia with a colorectal or coloanal anastomosis < 5 cm from the anal verge between 2013 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: patients in whom FA was employed (study group, 2015-2016) and those patients in whom it was not (control group, 2013-2015). All patients were diverted with a loop ileostomy. The primary outcome measured was the AL rate and the secondary outcome measured was change in surgical plan following FA. Sixty patients were included in the study: 30 patients in the FA group and 30 patients in the control group. Patients' demographics, the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, tumor stage, and mean height of anastomosis were comparable between the study groups. FA led to a change in surgical plan in four patients (13.3%) none of who suffered an AL. Two patients in the control group had a clinically and radiologically confirmed AL, whereas there were no leaks in the FA group (6.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.49). FA changed the surgical plan in 13.3% of LAR's, potentially reducing the incidence of AL in these high-risk patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 52%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 24 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#871,393
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#26
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,201
of 342,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.