| Title |
Mass spectrometry imaging for plant biology: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-015-9440-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Berin A. Boughton, Dinaiz Thinagaran, Daniel Sarabia, Antony Bacic, Ute Roessner |
| Abstract |
Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a developing technique to measure the spatio-temporal distribution of many biomolecules in tissues. Over the preceding decade, MSI has been adopted by plant biologists and applied in a broad range of areas, including primary metabolism, natural products, plant defense, plant responses to abiotic and biotic stress, plant lipids and the developing field of spatial metabolomics. This review covers recent advances in plant-based MSI, general aspects of instrumentation, analytical approaches, sample preparation and the current trends in respective plant research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 357 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 22% |
| Researcher | 65 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 73 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Unknown | 91 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,127,765
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#25
of 385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,305
of 295,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them