You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ischemic core and hypoperfusion volumes predict infarct size in SWIFT PRIME
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Neurology, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ana.24543 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory W Albers, Mayank Goyal, Reza Jahan, Alain Bonafe, Hans-Christoph Diener, Elad I Levy, Vitor M Pereira, Christophe Cognard, David J Cohen, Werner Hacke, Olav Jansen, Tudor G Jovin, Heinrich P Mattle, Raul G Nogueira, Adnan H Siddiqui, Dileep R Yavagal, Blaise W Baxter, Thomas G Devlin, Demetrius K Lopes, Vivek K Reddy, Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont, Oliver C Singer, Roland Bammer, Jeffrey L Saver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 16% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 25% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,422,295
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#4,857
of 5,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,165
of 400,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#39
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.