↓ Skip to main content

How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10649-010-9229-6
Authors

Ji-Won Son, Sharon L. Senk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Lecturer 8 7%
Professor 7 7%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 36%
Mathematics 26 24%
Psychology 12 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#8,359,935
of 24,989,834 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#318
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,034
of 99,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,989,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.