Title |
How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Educational Studies in Mathematics, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10649-010-9229-6 |
Authors |
Ji-Won Son, Sharon L. Senk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
Professor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 22% |
Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 38 | 36% |
Mathematics | 26 | 24% |
Psychology | 12 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#8,359,935
of 24,989,834 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#318
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,034
of 99,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,989,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.