↓ Skip to main content

Towards Investigating Global Warming Impact on Human Health Using Derivatives of Photoplethysmogram Signals

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards Investigating Global Warming Impact on Human Health Using Derivatives of Photoplethysmogram Signals
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, October 2015
DOI 10.3390/ijerph121012776
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed Elgendi, Ian Norton, Matt Brearley, Richard R. Fletcher, Derek Abbott, Nigel H. Lovell, Dale Schuurmans

Abstract

Recent clinical studies show that the contour of the photoplethysmogram (PPG) wave contains valuable information for characterizing cardiovascular activity. However, analyzing the PPG wave contour is difficult; therefore, researchers have applied first or higher order derivatives to emphasize and conveniently quantify subtle changes in the filtered PPG contour. Our hypothesis is that analyzing the whole PPG recording rather than each PPG wave contour or on a beat-by-beat basis can detect heat-stressed subjects and that, consequently, we will be able to investigate the impact of global warming on human health. Here, we explore the most suitable derivative order for heat stress assessment based on the energy and entropy of the whole PPG recording. The results of our study indicate that the use Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 7 12777 of the entropy of the seventh derivative of the filtered PPG signal shows promising results in detecting heat stress using 20-second recordings, with an overall accuracy of 71.6%. Moreover, the combination of the entropy of the seventh derivative of the filtered PPG signal with the root mean square of successive differences, or RMSSD (a traditional heart rate variability index of heat stress), improved the detection of heat stress to 88.9% accuracy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Engineering 5 10%
Psychology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#25,550
of 31,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,236
of 291,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#133
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.