↓ Skip to main content

Downstaging with Localized Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Can Identify Optimal Surgical Candidates in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Downstaging with Localized Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Can Identify Optimal Surgical Candidates in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6653-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Uk Chong, Gi Hong Choi, Dai Hoon Han, Kyung Sik Kim, Jinsil Seong, Kwang-Hyub Han, Jin Sub Choi

Abstract

Locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) has a poor oncological outcome. This study evaluated the oncological outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical resection after downstaging with localized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). From 2005 to 2014, 354 patients with locally advanced HCC underwent CCRT followed by HAIC. Among these patients, 149 patients with PVTT were analyzed. Exclusion criteria included a total bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dL, platelet count < 100,000/μL, and indocyanine green retention test (ICG R15) > 20%. During the same study period, 18 patients with PVTT underwent surgical resection as the first treatment. Clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes between groups were compared. Among 98 patients in the CCRT group, 26 patients (26.5%) underwent subsequent curative resection. The median follow-up period was 13 months (range 1-131 months). Disease-specific survival differed significantly between the resection after localized CCRT group and the resection-first group {median 62 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.99-101.01) versus 15 months (95% CI 10.84-19.16), respectively; P = 0.006}. Multivariate analyses showed that achievement of radiologic response was an independently good prognostic factor for both disease-specific survival (P = 0.039) and disease-free survival (P = 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Localized CCRT could be an effective tool for identifying optimal candidates for surgical treatment with favorable tumor biology. Furthermore, with a 26.5% resection rate and 100% response in PVTT for resection after CCRT, our localized CCRT protocol may be ideal for PVTT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,542,971
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,456
of 6,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,860
of 330,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#113
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.