↓ Skip to main content

The Outcome Evaluation of a CHW Cancer Prevention Intervention: Testing Individual and Multilevel Predictors Among Hispanics Living Along the Texas-Mexico Border

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
The Outcome Evaluation of a CHW Cancer Prevention Intervention: Testing Individual and Multilevel Predictors Among Hispanics Living Along the Texas-Mexico Border
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13187-015-0930-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharine Nimmons, Christopher E. Beaudoin, Julie A. St. John

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of community health workers/promotores (CHWs) in promoting cancer preventive behaviors in the 2011-2013 Education to Promote Improved Cancer Outcomes (ÉPICO) project. The ÉPICO project utilized CHWs to disseminate cancer education to predominately Spanish-speaking Hispanics living in colonias in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. The CHWs received training to become Texas-certified CHW instructors and specialized training in message tailoring, and they delivered more than 5000 units of resident education on cancer prevention/detection, treatment, and survivorship for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Using panel data to examine overtime changes in cancer knowledge among Lower Rio Grande Valley residents, the evaluation found significant changes from baseline to both times 1 and 2. Additional individual-level analysis indicated that the increase in resident cancer knowledge was predicted by residents' perceptions of CHW credibility and intention to change their lifestyles. Multilevel analysis also showed that the increase in cancer prevention knowledge among residents was predicted by attributes of the CHWs who taught them. In particular, CHWs with higher education levels had the most impact on residents' increased knowledge over time. Unexpectedly, CHWs with more years of experience were less effective teachers than their early-career counterparts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Psychology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,825,243
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#575
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,113
of 279,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.