↓ Skip to main content

Transportal central femoral tunnel placement has a significantly higher revision rate than transtibial AM femoral tunnel placement in hamstring ACL reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Transportal central femoral tunnel placement has a significantly higher revision rate than transtibial AM femoral tunnel placement in hamstring ACL reconstruction
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00167-018-5036-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Clatworthy, Steffen Sauer, Tim Roberts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,542,971
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,813
of 2,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,665
of 326,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#36
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.