↓ Skip to main content

Cigarette smoking: an underused tool in high-performance endurance training

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
602 X users
facebook
80 Facebook pages
googleplus
15 Google+ users
reddit
9 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cigarette smoking: an underused tool in high-performance endurance training
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2010
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.100042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth A Myers

Abstract

The review paper is a staple of medical literature and, when well executed by an expert in the field, can provide a summary of literature that generates useful recommendations and new conceptualizations of a topic. However, if research results are selectively chosen, a review has the potential to create a convincing argument for a faulty hypothesis. Improper correlation or extrapolation of data can result in dangerously flawed conclusions. The following paper seeks to illustrate this point, using existing research to argue the hypothesis that cigarette smoking enhances endurance performance and should be incorporated into high-level training programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 602 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 88 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 14 14%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Lecturer 7 7%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 24 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 24 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 578. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#41,255
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#69
of 9,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108
of 192,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.