↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of Weighted Vest Use During A Dietary Weight Loss Intervention and Effects on Body Composition and Physical Function in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Frailty & Aging, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of Weighted Vest Use During A Dietary Weight Loss Intervention and Effects on Body Composition and Physical Function in Older Adults
Published in
The Journal of Frailty & Aging, July 2018
DOI 10.14283/jfa.2018.17
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Normandin, D. Yow, C. Crotts, J. Kiel, K.M. Beavers, Barbara J. Nicklas

Abstract

While intentional weight loss in older adults with obesity yields clinically important health benefits there is a need to minimize the negative effects of weight loss on concomitant loss of muscle mass and strength. Data show wearing weighted vests during exercise improves lean mass and lower extremity strength, however the efficacy of wearing a weighted vest during a period of weight loss to mitigate muscle and strength loss is not known. This study examined the feasibility of daily weighted vest use during a dietary weight loss intervention, and examined effects of vest use on body composition and physical function in well-functioning older adults with obesity. Randomized, controlled pilot study. Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, NC. 37 older (age=65-79 yrs), obese (BMI=30-40 kg/ m2) sedentary men and women. 22-week behavioral diet intervention (targeting 10% weight loss, 1100-1300 kcals/day) with (Diet+Vest; n=20) or without (Diet; n=17) weighted vest use (goal of 10 hours/ day with weight added weekly according to individual loss of body mass). Body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and measures of physical function, mobility, and muscle strength/power. Average weighted vest use was 6.7±2.2 hours/day and the vest-wear goal of 10 hrs/day was achieved for 67±22% of total intervention days. Five participants reported adverse events from wearing the vest (all back pain or soreness). Both groups lost a similar amount of weight (Diet= -11.2±4.4 kg; Diet+Vest = -11.0±6.3 kg; p<0.001), with no differences between groups (p=0.25). Fat mass, lean mass, and % body fat decreased significantly (p<0.0001), with no differences between groups. Compared to Diet+Vest, the Diet intervention resulted in greater decreases in leg power (p<0.02), with no other between group differences in physical function. This pilot study showed that vest use during dietary weight loss is feasible and safe in well-functioning older adults with obesity. Larger studies are needed to definitively determine whether external replacement of lost weight during caloric restriction may preserve lower extremity muscle strength and power.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 54 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 64 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,396,859
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Frailty & Aging
#63
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,593
of 340,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Frailty & Aging
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them