↓ Skip to main content

Inherited determinants of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis phenotypes: a genetic association study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
619 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
838 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inherited determinants of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis phenotypes: a genetic association study
Published in
The Lancet, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00465-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Cleynen, Gabrielle Boucher, Luke Jostins, L Philip Schumm, Sebastian Zeissig, Tariq Ahmad, Vibeke Andersen, Jane M Andrews, Vito Annese, Stephan Brand, Steven R Brant, Judy H Cho, Mark J Daly, Marla Dubinsky, Richard H Duerr, Lynnette R Ferguson, Andre Franke, Richard B Gearry, Philippe Goyette, Hakon Hakonarson, Jonas Halfvarson, Johannes R Hov, Hailang Huang, Nicholas A Kennedy, Limas Kupcinskas, Ian C Lawrance, James C Lee, Jack Satsangi, Stephan Schreiber, Emilie Théâtre, Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong, Rinse K Weersma, David C Wilson, International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium, Miles Parkes, Severine Vermeire, John D Rioux, John Mansfield, Mark S Silverberg, Graham Radford-Smith, Dermot P B McGovern, Jeffrey C Barrett, Charlie W Lees

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 218 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 838 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 821 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 143 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 129 15%
Student > Bachelor 91 11%
Student > Master 84 10%
Other 66 8%
Other 145 17%
Unknown 180 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 246 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 111 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 53 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 3%
Other 99 12%
Unknown 215 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 230. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#168,854
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,065
of 42,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,235
of 296,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#23
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.