You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Having Trouble Typing? What on Earth Is Chronotype?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biological Rhythms, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0748730415603835 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Till Roenneberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,923,136
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Rhythms
#471
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,064
of 293,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Rhythms
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.