| Title |
Relict microorganisms of cryolithozone as possible objects of gerontology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Gerontology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1134/s207905701101005x |
| Authors |
A. V. Brouchkov, V. P. Melnikov, Yu. G. Sukhovei, G. I. Griva, V. E. Repin, L. F. Kalenova, E. V. Brenner, A. M. Subbotin, Y. B. Trofimova, M. Tanaka, T. Katayama, M. Utsumi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 29% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,123,634
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Gerontology
#2
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,091
of 106,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Gerontology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 40 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them