| Title |
The same old mistakes in aquaculture: the newly-available striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus is on its way to putting Brazilian freshwater ecosystems at risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-018-1603-1 |
| Authors |
Diego A. Z. Garcia, André L. B. Magalhães, Jean R. S. Vitule, Armando C. R. Casimiro, Dilermando P. Lima-Junior, Almir M. Cunico, Marcelo F. G. Brito, Miguel Petrere-Junior, Ângelo A. Agostinho, Mário L. Orsi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Fiji | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,171,492
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,889
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,545
of 333,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#32
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.