↓ Skip to main content

Does a Mediterranean-Type Diet Reduce Cancer Risk?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Nutrition Reports, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 378)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Does a Mediterranean-Type Diet Reduce Cancer Risk?
Published in
Current Nutrition Reports, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13668-015-0141-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas Schwingshackl, Georg Hoffmann

Abstract

Overall cancer incidence has been observed to be lower in Mediterranean countries compared to that in Northern countries, such as the UK, and the USA. There is increasing evidence that adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern correlates with reduced risk of several cancer types and cancer mortality. In addition, specific aspects of the Mediterranean diet, such as high consumption of fruit and vegetables, whole grains, and low processed meat intake, are inversely associated with risk of tumor pathogenesis at different cancer sites. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available evidence regarding the association between the Mediterranean diet and cancer risk from clinical trials, prospective cohort studies, and case-control studies. Furthermore, we focused on the different definitions of a Mediterranean diet in an attempt to assess their efficiency. Observational studies provide new evidence suggesting that high adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with reduced risk of overall cancer mortality as well as a reduced risk of incidence of several cancer types (especially cancers of the colorectum, aerodigestive tract, breast, stomach, pancreas, prostate, liver, and head and neck).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 20%
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#122,609
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Current Nutrition Reports
#5
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,477
of 286,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Nutrition Reports
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them