| Title |
Calcium dobesilate for diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Life Sciences, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11427-014-4792-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
XinYuan Zhang, Wei Liu, ShanShan Wu, JingLong Jin, WeiHong Li, NingLi Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,574,799
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#279
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,419
of 354,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.