↓ Skip to main content

Why Separation Logic Works

Overview of attention for article published in Knowledge In Society, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Why Separation Logic Works
Published in
Knowledge In Society, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13347-018-0312-8
Authors

David Pym, Jonathan M. Spring, Peter O’Hearn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 38%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,801,384
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Knowledge In Society
#386
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,363
of 344,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knowledge In Society
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.