↓ Skip to main content

Do grazers respond to or control food quality? Cross-scale analysis of algivorous fish in littoral Lake Tanganyika

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Do grazers respond to or control food quality? Cross-scale analysis of algivorous fish in littoral Lake Tanganyika
Published in
Oecologia, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00442-018-4240-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renalda N. Munubi, Peter B. McIntyre, Yvonne Vadeboncoeur

Abstract

Food quality determines the growth rate of primary consumers and ecosystem trophic efficiencies, but it is not clear whether variation in primary consumer densities control, or is controlled by, variation in food quality. We quantified variation in the density and condition of an abundant algae-eating cichlid, Tropheus brichardi, with respect to the quality and productivity of algal biofilms within and across rocky coastal sites in Lake Tanganyika, East Africa. Adjacent land use and sediment deposition in the littoral zone varied widely among sites. Tropheus brichardi maximized both caloric and phosphorus intake at the local scale by aggregating in shallow habitats: algivore density decreased with depth, tracking attached algae productivity (rETRMAX) remarkably well (r2 = 0.84, P = 0.00033). In contrast, algivore density was unrelated to among-site variation in algal productivity. Rather, there was significant increase in algal quality (r2 = 0.44, P = 0.011) and decrease in algal biomass (r2 = 0.53, P = 0.0068) with T. brichardi density across sites, consistent with strong top-down control of primary producers. The amount of inorganic sediment on rock surfaces was the strongest predictor of among-site variation in algivore density (r2 = 0.69, P = 0.00096), and algivore gut length increased with sedimentation (r2 = 0.36, P = 0.034). These patterns indicate extrinsic and top-down forcing of algal food quality and quantity across coastal landscapes, combined with adaptive habitat selection by fish at the local scale. Factors that degrade food quality by decreasing algal nutrient content or diluting the resource with indigestible material are likely to depress grazer densities, potentially dampening top-down control in high-light, low-nutrient aquatic ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 34%
Environmental Science 9 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#13,548,681
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,940
of 4,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,094
of 331,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#38
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.