↓ Skip to main content

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and toxicities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and toxicities
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00432-018-2729-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanislav Lazarev, Camille Hardy-Abeloos, Oren Factor, Kenneth Rosenzweig, Michael Buckstein

Abstract

To examine safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (CL-HCC). Fifty-three patients with CL-HCC were treated with SBRT from 2011 to 2017 in our institution. CL-HCC was defined as a tumor sited in segments 4, 5, or 8 adjacent to the hepatic hilum, or < 1.5 cm from main portal branches. Primary endpoints were treatment response, local control (LC), and hepatobiliary toxicity (HBT). Thirty-three (62.3%) patients had Child-Turcotte-Pugh score A, 20 (37.77%)-score B. Albumin-bilirubin grade 1 constituted 6 (11.3%) cases, grade 2-32 (60.4%), grade 3-15 (28.3%). Median tumor diameter was 34 mm. Median BED10 was 72 Gy. Complete/partial response was observed in 40 (75.5%) lesions, stable disease-in 9 (17.0%). At a median follow-up of 12.2 months, there were 6 (11.3%) local failures. The actuarial 2-year LC rate was 87.9%. 2-year LC was better with higher BED10 (> 70 vs ≤ 70 Gy) 96.9 vs 72.5%, p = 0.01. The 2-year rates for disease-specific and overall survival were 53.2 and 39.1%, respectively. The incidence of any Grade ≥ 3 AE was 9 (17.0%). There were no grade 5 AEs. There was a trend toward an increased risk of grade ≥ 3 AE with mean liver dose > 10 Gy (p = 0.07). In the present cohort, SBRT to the CL-HCC produced excellent treatment response with acceptable HBT and LC. Select HCC patients who are not candidates for surgery or other locoregional therapies can be considered for SBRT to the central liver.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Computer Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2018.
All research outputs
#21,164,509
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#2,053
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,551
of 332,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.