| Title |
Two types of mound built by the termite Macrotermes subhyalinus in Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1742758400004914 |
| Authors |
Johanna P. E. C. Darlington |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,316,655
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Tropical Insect Science
#7
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,683
of 145,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Tropical Insect Science
#3
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.