↓ Skip to main content

Delayed childbearing and female ageing impair assisted reproductive technology outcome in survivors of male haematological cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Delayed childbearing and female ageing impair assisted reproductive technology outcome in survivors of male haematological cancers
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10815-018-1283-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti, Luciano Negri, Annamaria Baggiani, Emanuela Morenghi, Elena Albani, Valentina Parini, Luca Cafaro, Carola Maria Conca Dioguardi, Amalia Cesana, Antonella Smeraldi, Armando Santoro

Abstract

To analyse the impact of female characteristics on assisted reproductive technology outcome among male haematological cancer survivors. A retrospective analysis of 93 haematological cancer survivors attending our tertiary referral fertility centre between June 1998 and June 2017 for achieving fatherhood with assisted reproductive technology treatments. A progressive increase in the median female age was observed during the study period (32.2 years until the year 2007 and 36.9 years from the year 2012). Fifty-five out of 93 patients were treated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (113 ovarian stimulations, 108 ICSI procedures). Cryopreserved ejaculated sperm was used in 28 couples, fresh sperm in 19, and thawed testicular sperm in 8 couples. Mean female age at ovarian stimulation was 37.0 ± 4.7 years. Twenty-six pregnancies resulted in a full-term birth (23% per started ovarian stimulation; 43.6% per couple) and 33 children were born. No significant differences were observed according to source of sperm (fresh, frozen, testicular) and multivariate analysis confirmed that maternal age was the only variable inversely related to the cumulative delivery rate, being five times lower (15.7%) when the female partner was ≥ 40 years (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.77) vs. 58.3% with younger women (p = 0.0037). Delayed childbearing and female ageing affect ICSI outcome in couples where the male is a survivor of haematological cancer. This topic should be discussed when counselling male cancer patients about fertility preservation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2018.
All research outputs
#21,608,038
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#1,433
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,608
of 334,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#36
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.