You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Palaeodata-informed modelling of large carbon losses from recent burning of boreal forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Climate Change, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nclimate2832 |
| Authors |
Ryan Kelly, Hélène Genet, A. David McGuire, Feng Sheng Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Professor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 27 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#457,738
of 24,701,106 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#1,155
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,762
of 289,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#32
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.