↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

His Bundle Pacing

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
216 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
His Bundle Pacing
Published in
JACC, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, Mina K. Chung, Gopi Dandamudi, Gaurav A. Upadhyay, Kousik Krishnan, George Crossley, Kristen Bova Campbell, Byron K. Lee, Marwan M. Refaat, Sanjeev Saksena, John D. Fisher, Dhananjaya Lakkireddy, ACC’s Electrophysiology Council

Abstract

Traditional right ventricular (RV) pacing for the management of bradyarrhythmias has been pursued successfully for decades, although there remains debate regarding optimal pacing site with respect to both hemodynamic and clinical outcomes. The deleterious effects of long-term RV apical pacing have been well recognized. This has generated interest in approaches providing more physiological stimulation, namely, His bundle pacing (HBP). This paper reviews the anatomy of the His bundle, early clinical observations, and current approaches to permanent HBP. By stimulating the His-Purkinje network, HBP engages electrical activation of both ventricles and may avoid marked dyssynchrony. Recent studies have also demonstrated the potential of HBP in patients with underlying left bundle branch block and cardiomyopathy. HBP holds promise as an attractive mode to achieve physiological pacing. Widespread adaptation of this technique is dependent on enhancements in technology, as well as further validation of efficacy in large randomized clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 216 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 14%
Other 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 77 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 48%
Engineering 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Computer Science 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 90 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#279,914
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#628
of 16,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,814
of 343,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#23
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.