| Title |
S2k-Leitlinie: Indikation Knieendoprothese
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Orthopädie, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00132-018-3612-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Lützner, T. Lange, J. Schmitt, C. Kopkow, M. Aringer, DGRh, E. Böhle, ZVK, H. Bork, DGOU, K. Dreinhöfer, DNVF, N. Friederich, Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e. V., S. Gravius, DGOOC, K.-D. Heller, BVOU, R. Hube, DKG, E. Gromnica-Ihle, Deutsche Rheuma-Liga Bundesverband e. V., S. Kirschner, AE, B. Kladny, DGOU, M. Kremer, DGU, M. Linke, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Psychologie, J. Malzahn, AOK Bundesverband, R. Sabatowski, Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e. V., H.-P. Scharf, J. Stöve, R. Wagner, DGORh, K.-P. Günther |
| Abstract |
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequent surgical procedures in orthopaedic surgery. Until now there have not been any standardized indication criteria, which might contribute to the large geographical differences in the frequency of TKA. This guideline aims to consent minimal requirements (main criteria), additional important aspects (minor criteria), as well as relative and absolute contraindications for TKA. The following main criteria have been consented: knee pain, radiological confirmation of osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis, inadequate response to conservative treatment, adverse impact of knee disease on the patient's quality of life and the burden of suffering due to the knee disease. Relative contraindications have been consented as severe general disease with reduced life expectancy and a BMI ≥40; absolute contraindications are an active infection and if the patient is not able to undergo major surgery. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,633
of 341,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.