↓ Skip to main content

High-throughput screening using patient-derived tumor xenografts to predict clinical trial drug response

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
96 X users
patent
23 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1076 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1076 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-throughput screening using patient-derived tumor xenografts to predict clinical trial drug response
Published in
Nature Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/nm.3954
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Gao, Joshua M Korn, Stéphane Ferretti, John E Monahan, Youzhen Wang, Mallika Singh, Chao Zhang, Christian Schnell, Guizhi Yang, Yun Zhang, O Alejandro Balbin, Stéphanie Barbe, Hongbo Cai, Fergal Casey, Susmita Chatterjee, Derek Y Chiang, Shannon Chuai, Shawn M Cogan, Scott D Collins, Ernesta Dammassa, Nicolas Ebel, Millicent Embry, John Green, Audrey Kauffmann, Colleen Kowal, Rebecca J Leary, Joseph Lehar, Ying Liang, Alice Loo, Edward Lorenzana, E Robert McDonald, Margaret E McLaughlin, Jason Merkin, Ronald Meyer, Tara L Naylor, Montesa Patawaran, Anupama Reddy, Claudia Röelli, David A Ruddy, Fernando Salangsang, Francesca Santacroce, Angad P Singh, Yan Tang, Walter Tinetto, Sonja Tobler, Roberto Velazquez, Kavitha Venkatesan, Fabian Von Arx, Hui Qin Wang, Zongyao Wang, Marion Wiesmann, Daniel Wyss, Fiona Xu, Hans Bitter, Peter Atadja, Emma Lees, Francesco Hofmann, En Li, Nicholas Keen, Robert Cozens, Michael Rugaard Jensen, Nancy K Pryer, Juliet A Williams, William R Sellers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,076 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 1043 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 266 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 199 18%
Student > Master 79 7%
Student > Bachelor 60 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 5%
Other 167 16%
Unknown 250 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 246 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 202 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 122 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 52 5%
Engineering 29 3%
Other 145 13%
Unknown 280 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#624,207
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,902
of 9,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,215
of 297,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#17
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.