| Title |
Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training on glycemic control and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-018-1012-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing-xin Liu, Lin Zhu, Pei-jun Li, Ning Li, Yan-bing Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 293 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Professor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 17% |
| Unknown | 112 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 56 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 120 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#192,274
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#9
of 1,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,907
of 341,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.