↓ Skip to main content

Hygiene Hypothesis and Autoimmune Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 706)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
560 Mendeley
Title
Hygiene Hypothesis and Autoimmune Diseases
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12016-011-8285-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graham A. W. Rook

Abstract

Throughout the twentieth century, there were striking increases in the incidences of many chronic inflammatory disorders in the rich developed countries. These included autoimmune disorders such as Type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis. Although genetics and specific triggering mechanisms such as molecular mimicry and viruses are likely to be involved, the increases have been so rapid that any explanation that omits environmental change is incomplete. This chapter suggests that a series of environmental factors, most of them microbial, have led to a decrease in the efficiency of our immunoregulatory mechanisms because we are in a state of evolved dependence on organisms with which we co-evolved (and that had to be tolerated) as inducers of immunoregulatory circuits. These organisms ("Old Friends") are depleted from the modern urban environment. Rather than considering fetal programming by maternal microbial exposures, neonatal programming, the hygiene hypothesis, gut microbiota, and diet as separate and competing hypotheses, I attempt here to integrate these ideas under a single umbrella concept that can provide the missing immunoregulatory environmental factor that is needed to explain the recent increases in autoimmune disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 560 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 546 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 113 20%
Student > Master 94 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 14%
Researcher 65 12%
Other 30 5%
Other 82 15%
Unknown 95 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 109 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 43 8%
Social Sciences 29 5%
Other 71 13%
Unknown 115 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#877,258
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#22
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,892
of 250,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.