| Title |
Rufous Common Cuckoo chicks are not always female
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-018-1591-7 |
| Authors |
Jaroslav Koleček, Michal Šulc, Radka Piálková, Jolyon Troscianko, Milica Požgayová, Marcel Honza, Petr Procházka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| Czechia | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 40% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,066,897
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#148
of 1,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,343
of 336,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.