↓ Skip to main content

The role played by invasive species in interactions with endangered and threatened species in the United States: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 2,373)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
The role played by invasive species in interactions with endangered and threatened species in the United States: a systematic review
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10531-018-1595-x
Authors

Manuel-Angel Dueñas, Holly J. Ruffhead, Nicola H. Wakefield, Philip D. Roberts, David J. Hemming, Hilda Diaz-Soltero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 67 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 35%
Environmental Science 37 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 75 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#345,739
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#30
of 2,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,586
of 335,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.