↓ Skip to main content

Transferability of decision-support tools

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Transferability of decision-support tools
Published in
Climatic Change, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2263-6
Authors

Roger B. Street, Patrick Pringle, Tiago Capela Lourenço, Mariana Nicolletti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 34%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 25%
Social Sciences 11 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Engineering 4 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,646,262
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,552
of 5,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,706
of 331,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#56
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.