↓ Skip to main content

A Meta-Analysis of Universal School-Based Prevention Programs for Anxiety and Depression in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
A Meta-Analysis of Universal School-Based Prevention Programs for Anxiety and Depression in Children
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10567-018-0266-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristy M. Johnstone, Eva Kemps, Junwen Chen

Abstract

Anxiety and depression are among the most common mental health issues experienced in childhood. Implementing school-based prevention programs during childhood, rather than adolescence, is thought to provide better mental health outcomes. The present meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of universal school-based prevention programs that target both anxiety and depression in children (aged 13 years or below), and examine three moderators (i.e., program type, primary target of program, and number of sessions) on prevention effects. PsycINFO, PubMED, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for relevant articles published up to and including January 2018. Fourteen randomised controlled trials, consisting of 5970 children, met eligibility criteria. Prevention programs led to significantly fewer depressive symptoms at post-program (g = 0.172) and at long-term follow-up periods (g = 0.180), but not at short-term follow-up. Programs were not found to prevent anxiety symptoms across any time point. Considerable heterogeneity was observed for all effects. Program type and length were found to moderate the relationship between prevention program and outcomes. Prevention programs were effective in preventing depressive symptoms at post-program and long-term follow-up, while no significant preventative effect on anxiety symptoms was observed. The FRIENDS Program and programs which contained a greater number of sessions showed beneficial effects on anxiety and depressive symptoms. Universal programs aimed at preventing both anxiety and depression in children are limited. Future research should investigate the long-term evaluation of school-based prevention programs for anxiety and depression in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 88 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 23%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 93 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,334,615
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#176
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,590
of 337,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.