↓ Skip to main content

Development of triple-negative breast cancer radiosensitive gene signature and validation based on transcriptome analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Development of triple-negative breast cancer radiosensitive gene signature and validation based on transcriptome analysis
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10549-015-3611-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alimujiang Wushou, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Jing Hou, Yi-Rong Liu, Xiao-Mao Guo, Zhi-Ming Shao

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with highest loco-regional recurrence among breast cancer subtypes. Radiotherapy is indispensable for TNBC loco-regional control. However, intrinsic radiosensitivity differences exist in TNBC patients and RT is still prescribed mainly based on conventional clinicopathologic features of patients without considering the differences. The purpose of the present study is to develop and validate a TNBC radiosensitive gene signature (RSGS) and to guide therapeutic decisions. In this study, we compared transcriptome profiles of 12 locally recurrent TNBCs to 20 non-locally recurrent TNBCs treated with surgery radio-chemotherapy and developed a seven-gene RSGS and a simplified three-gene RSGS by using pathway analysis, univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model and rank-based linear algorithm. They were validated by using transcriptome profiles of 166 TNBC patients. Two gene signatures specifically identified a radiosensitive population that had an improved recurrence-free survival in patients treated with surgery radio-chemotherapy (Radiosensitive patients vs radioresistant patients, for seven-gene RSGS: P = 0.024, HR = 0.35, 95 %CI 0.14-0.87 and for three-gene RSGS: P = 0.035, HR = 0.38, 95 %CI 0.15-0.94). In contrast, there was no significant difference in outcome between predicted radiosensitive and radioresistant patients that treated with other treatment modality. RSGSs provide a useful tool for identification of radiosensitive/radioresistant TNBC patients and they could lead to a better selection of patients for RT protocols.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Librarian 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,716
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,144
of 283,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#53
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.