You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional gradients of the cerebellum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
eLife, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.7554/elife.36652 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xavier Guell, Jeremy D Schmahmann, John DE Gabrieli, Satrajit S Ghosh |
| Abstract |
A central principle for understanding the cerebral cortex is that macroscale anatomy reflects a functional hierarchy from primary to transmodal processing. In contrast, the central axis of motor and nonmotor macroscale organization in the cerebellum remains unknown. Here we applied diffusion map embedding to resting-state data from the Human Connectome Project dataset (n = 1003), and show for the first time that cerebellar functional regions follow a gradual organization which progresses from primary (motor) to transmodal (DMN, task-unfocused) regions. A secondary axis extends from task-unfocused to task-focused processing. Further, these two principal gradients revealed novel functional properties of the well-established cerebellar double motor representation (lobules I-VI and VIII), and its relationship with the recently described triple nonmotor representation (lobules VI/Crus I, Crus II/VIIB, IX/X). Functional differences exist not only between the two motor but also between the three nonmotor representations, and second motor representation might share functional similarities with third nonmotor representation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
| Australia | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 51% |
| Scientists | 31 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 321 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 20% |
| Researcher | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 88 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 99 | 31% |
| Psychology | 28 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 118 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#843,136
of 25,468,789 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#2,688
of 15,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,811
of 341,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#68
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.