↓ Skip to main content

Taped Problems Intervention Components: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Contemporary School Psychology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Taped Problems Intervention Components: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
Contemporary School Psychology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40688-018-0200-3
Authors

Kathleen B. Aspiranti, Elizabeth McCallum, Ara J. Schmitt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 22%
Psychology 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,987,106
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary School Psychology
#116
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,174
of 331,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary School Psychology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.