| Title |
Hybrid Pulmonary Vein Stenting in Infants with Refractory to Surgical Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Cardiology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00246-018-1944-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ja Kyoung Yoon, Gi Beom Kim, Mi Kyoung Song, Eun Jung Bae, Woong Han Kim, Jae Gun Kwak, Jeong Ryul Lee |
| Abstract |
Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is still a frustrating disease with extremely high mortality, especially in children with multiple severe PVS. Hybrid pulmonary vein stenting (HPVS) is a rescue treatment for recurrent and malignant PVS. The aim of this study is to share our successful experience with intraoperative HPVS for recurrent PVS after total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) repair in infant. Six patients were identified between 2013 and January 2018, who were diagnosed with recurrent PVS and underwent HPVS in the operating room. The mean age at the time of the HPVS was 10.3 ± 2.7 months (range 7-14 months) and the mean body weight was 7.9 ± 2.6 kg (range 4.1-10.5 kg). Prior pulmonary vein surgery had been performed on average 2.7 times (range 2-3) in all patients. We used a bare-metal stent (BMS) of 6-8 mm diameter in 15 veins of five patients and a drug-eluting coronary stent (DES) in two veins of one patient. All patients had undergone several elective further pulmonary vein in-stent balloon dilatations or another stent insertion after HPVS. Over a mean follow-up of 17.3 ± 13.7 months (range 6-44 months), all patients maintained patency of stents although two patients died due to respiratory failure not associated with PVS. HPVS is a useful treatment modality for recurrent PVS patient that could save the life and achieve longer freedom from restenosis than repetitive surgical pulmonary vein widening only. Even though the prognosis of severe multiple PVS is very poor, planned HPVS could be a good palliation in this patients group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,647,094
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#867
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,515
of 330,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.