↓ Skip to main content

Coexistence of Kaposi’s sarcoma and psoriasis: is there a hidden relationship?

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Dermatology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Coexistence of Kaposi’s sarcoma and psoriasis: is there a hidden relationship?
Published in
European Journal of Dermatology, October 2018
DOI 10.1684/ejd.2018.3288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucia Brambilla, Giovanni Genovese, Athanasia Tourlaki, Silvia Della Bella

Abstract

The relationship between Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) and psoriasis is still controversial. To analyse the association between KS and psoriasis, address the hypothesis of a reciprocal influence between the two conditions relative to clinical presentation and evolution, and consider the best therapeutic approach to be used for the treatment of psoriasis in KS patients in order to avoid the typical induction or worsening of KS during immunosuppression. We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 37 patients with KS and psoriasis. Fisher's exact test was performed in order to compare epidemiological and clinical data between subsets of patients. The prevalence of psoriasis in our KS population (n = 1407) was 2.6%. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of stage or rate of progression between KS patients with and without psoriasis, except for a higher frequency of patients with KS Stage IIB among patients with KS and psoriasis (p = 0.001). Patients with psoriasis have a risk of KS comparable to that of the general population. Psoriasis and KS do not appear to influence each other. For the treatment of psoriasis in KS patients, one should take into account the KS-inducing potential of certain anti-psoriatic drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Dermatology
#307
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,712
of 358,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Dermatology
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.