| Title |
The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01709751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. -L. Vincent, R. Moreno, J. Takala, S. Willatts, A. De Mendonça, H. Bruining, C. K. Reinhart, P. M. Suter, L. G. Thijs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,481 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Belarus | 2 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1461 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 166 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 151 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 138 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 137 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 110 | 7% |
| Other | 317 | 21% |
| Unknown | 462 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 602 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 48 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 40 | 3% |
| Engineering | 39 | 3% |
| Other | 182 | 12% |
| Unknown | 510 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#772,737
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#728
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169
of 28,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.