↓ Skip to main content

Timothy LaPira and Herschel Thomas: Revolving door lobbying: public service, private influence, and the unequal representation of interests (studies in government and public policy)

Overview of attention for article published in Interest Groups & Advocacy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Timothy LaPira and Herschel Thomas: Revolving door lobbying: public service, private influence, and the unequal representation of interests (studies in government and public policy)
Published in
Interest Groups & Advocacy, July 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41309-018-0037-1
Authors

Jeffrey Lazarus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,884,238
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#128
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,136
of 332,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.