You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The evaluation of argument mapping as a learning tool: Comparing the effects of map reading versus text reading on comprehension and recall of arguments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Thinking Skills & Creativity, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tsc.2009.05.001 |
| Authors |
Christopher P. Dwyer, Michael J. Hogan, Ian Stewart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 32% |
| Psychology | 9 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,619,094
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Thinking Skills & Creativity
#92
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,273
of 103,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thinking Skills & Creativity
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.