↓ Skip to main content

Improved walnut-feeding skills with experience in wood mice, Apodemus speciosus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Improved walnut-feeding skills with experience in wood mice, Apodemus speciosus
Published in
Journal of Ethology, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10164-008-0087-y
Authors

Reina Takechi, Noriko Tamura, Fumio Hayashi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 50%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#180
of 501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,478
of 81,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.