↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the cortisol awakening response: Expert consensus guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Psychoneuroendocrinology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
738 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
692 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of the cortisol awakening response: Expert consensus guidelines
Published in
Psychoneuroendocrinology, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Stalder, Clemens Kirschbaum, Brigitte M. Kudielka, Emma K. Adam, Jens C. Pruessner, Stefan Wüst, Samantha Dockray, Nina Smyth, Phil Evans, Dirk H. Hellhammer, Robert Miller, Mark A. Wetherell, Sonia J. Lupien, Angela Clow

Abstract

The cortisol awakening response (CAR), the marked increase in cortisol secretion over the first 30-45min after morning awakening, has been related to a wide range of psychosocial, physical and mental health parameters, making it a key variable for psychoneuroendocrinological research. The CAR is typically assessed from self-collection of saliva samples within the domestic setting. While this confers ecological validity, it lacks direct researcher oversight which can be problematic as the validity of CAR measurement critically relies on participants closely following a timed sampling schedule, beginning with the moment of awakening. Researchers assessing the CAR thus need to take important steps to maximize and monitor saliva sampling accuracy as well as consider a range of other relevant methodological factors. To promote best practice of future research in this field, the International Society of Psychoneuroendocrinology initiated an expert panel charged with (i) summarizing relevant evidence and collective experience on methodological factors affecting CAR assessment and (ii) formulating clear consensus guidelines for future research. The present report summarizes the results of this undertaking. Consensus guidelines are presented on central aspects of CAR assessment, including objective control of sampling accuracy/adherence, participant instructions, covariate accounting, sampling protocols, quantification strategies as well as reporting and interpreting of CAR data. Meeting these methodological standards in future research will create more powerful research designs, thus yielding more reliable and reproducible results and helping to further advance understanding in this evolving field of research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 692 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 685 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 17%
Researcher 104 15%
Student > Bachelor 73 11%
Student > Master 71 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 64 9%
Other 110 16%
Unknown 154 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 212 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 86 12%
Neuroscience 61 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Other 91 13%
Unknown 197 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#358,103
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Psychoneuroendocrinology
#109
of 3,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,999
of 297,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychoneuroendocrinology
#5
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.