↓ Skip to main content

Identifying teaching in wild animals

Overview of attention for article published in Learning & Behavior, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Identifying teaching in wild animals
Published in
Learning & Behavior, July 2010
DOI 10.3758/lb.38.3.297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Thornton, Nichola J. Raihani

Abstract

After a long period of neglect, the study of teaching in nonhuman animals is beginning to take a more prominent role in research on social learning. Unlike other forms of social learning, teaching requires knowledgeable individuals to play an active role in facilitating learning by the naive. Casting aside anthropocentric requirements for cognitive mechanisms assumed to underpin teaching in our own species, researchers are now beginning to discover evidence for teaching across a wide range of taxa. Nevertheless, unequivocal evidence for teaching remains scarce, with convincing experimental data limited to meerkats, pied babblers, and tandem-running ants. In this review, our aim is to stimulate further research in different species and contexts by providing conceptual and methodological guidelines for identifying teaching, with a focus on natural populations. We begin by highlighting the fact that teaching is a form of cooperative behavior that functions to promote learning in others and show that consideration of these key characteristics is critical in helping to identify suitable targets for future research. We then go on to discuss potential observational, experimental, and statistical techniques that may assist researchers in providing evidence that the criteria that make up the accepted operational definition of teaching have been met. Supplemental materials for this article may be downloaded from http://lb.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 211 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 22%
Student > Bachelor 37 16%
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 44%
Psychology 24 11%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Environmental Science 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 57 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Behavior
#790
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,978
of 104,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Behavior
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.