| Title |
Phoretic mites (Acari: Chaetodactylidae) associated with the solitary bee Tetrapedia diversipes (Apidae: Tetrapediini)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Apidologie, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1051/apido/2010044 |
| Authors |
Guaraci Duran Cordeiro, Mariana Taniguchi, Carlos Holger Wenzel Flechtmann, Isabel Alves-dos-Santos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 65% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,575,113
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#265
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,418
of 112,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.