↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Use and Correlates of Patient Satisfaction with a Large Nationwide Direct to Consumer Telemedicine Service

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of Use and Correlates of Patient Satisfaction with a Large Nationwide Direct to Consumer Telemedicine Service
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11606-018-4621-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn A. Martinez, Mark Rood, Nikhyl Jhangiani, Lei Kou, Susannah Rose, Adrienne Boissy, Michael B. Rothberg

Abstract

Despite its rapid expansion, little is known about use of direct to consumer (DTC) telemedicine. To characterize telemedicine patients and physicians and correlates of patient satisfaction DESIGN: Cross-sectional study PARTICIPANTS: Patients and physicians of a large nationwide DTC telemedicine service MAIN MEASURES: Patient characteristics included demographics and whether or not they reported insurance information. Physician characteristics included specialty, board certification, and domestic versus international medical training. Encounter characteristics included time of day, wait time, length, coupon use for free or reduced-cost care, diagnostic outcome, prescription receipt, and patient/physician geographic concordance. Patients rated satisfaction with physicians on scales of 0 to 5 stars and reported where they would have sought care had they not used telemedicine. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with 5-star physician ratings. The analysis included 28,222 encounters between 24,040 patients and 277 physicians completed between January 2013 and August 2016. Sixty-five percent of patients were under 40 years and 32% did not report insurance information. Family medicine was the most common physician specialty (47%) and 16% trained at a non-US medical school. Coupons were used in 24% of encounters. Respiratory infections were diagnosed in 35% of encounters and 69% resulted in a prescription. Had they not used telemedicine, 43% of patients reported they would have used urgent care/retail clinic, 29% would have gone to the doctor's office, 15% would have done nothing, and 6% would have gone to the emergency department. Eighty-five percent of patients rated their physician 5 stars. High satisfaction was positively correlated with prescription receipt (OR 2.98; 95%CI 2.74-3.23) and coupon use (OR 1.47; 95%CI 1.33-1.62). Patients were largely satisfied with DTC telemedicine, yet satisfaction varied by coupon use and prescription receipt. The impact of telemedicine on primary care and emergency department use is likely to be small under present usage patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 64 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 71 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,992,881
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,503
of 8,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,368
of 336,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#25
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.