| Title |
Effectiveness of genera as a higher-taxon substitute for species in ant biodiversity analyses is not affected by sampling technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-018-1607-x |
| Authors |
Jorge L. P. Souza, Fabricio B. Baccaro, Pedro A. C. L. Pequeno, Elizabeth Franklin, William E. Magnusson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,630,207
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,849
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,526
of 333,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.