| Title |
The Use of Two Bifidobacterium Strains Enhanced Growth Performance and Nutrient Utilization of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Fry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12602-018-9455-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javad Sahandi, Hojatollah Jafaryan, Mehdi Soltani, Pouneh Ebrahimi |
| Abstract |
This study aims to evaluate the effects of Bifidobacterium animalis PTCC-1631 and Bifidobacterium lactis PTCC-1736 on growth, nutrient digestibility, carcass composition, and intestinal microbiota of Oncorhynchus mykiss fry, which had initial body weights of 0.58 ± 0.19 g. Four iso-nitrogenous diets with probiotics, namely T1 (1 × 107 CFU g-1), T2 (2 × 107 CFU g-1), T3 (3 × 107 CFU g-1), and control without probiotics were obtained. Total 480 fish were randomly divided in four treatments (three experimental treatments and a control), each with 4 replicates including 16 tanks each filled with 15 L-1 of water (water exchange rate of 2 L min-1 and aerated with air stone) with a density of 2 fry L-1. The water mean temperature was 17.66 ± 1.33 °C, and the mean pH value was 7.63 ± 0.08. After eight weeks of the experiment T1 that fed with a diet contained the lowest bacterial concentration showed higher growth, nutrient utilization, digestibility, and lower feed conversion ratio (P < 0.05) in comparison with T2, T3, and the control. Also, the highest count of lactobacillus bacteria was observed in T1 that was fed with a diet containing the lowest probiotic. The lowest concentration of Bifidobacterium strains in this study induced better growth and increased digestion and nutrient utilization in trout fry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,422,940
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
#188
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,318
of 331,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.