↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Corrigendum: Whole–genome characterization of chemoresistant ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Corrigendum: Whole–genome characterization of chemoresistant ovarian cancer
Published in
Nature, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature15716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann-Marie Patch, Elizabeth L. Christie, Dariush Etemadmoghadam, Dale W. Garsed, Joshy George, Sian Fereday, Katia Nones, Prue Cowin, Kathryn Alsop, Peter J. Bailey, Karin S. Kassahn, Felicity Newell, Michael C. J. Quinn, Stephen Kazakoff, Kelly Quek, Charlotte Wilhelm-Benartzi, Ed Curry, Huei San Leong, Anne Hamilton, Linda Mileshkin, George Au-Yeung, Catherine Kennedy, Jillian Hung, Yoke-Eng Chiew, Paul Harnett, Michael Friedlander, Michael Quinn, Jan Pyman, Stephen Cordner, Patricia O’Brien, Jodie Leditschke, Greg Young, Kate Strachan, Paul Waring, Walid Azar, Chris Mitchell, Nadia Traficante, Joy Hendley, Heather Thorne, Mark Shackleton, David K. Miller, Gisela Mir Arnau, Richard W. Tothill, Timothy P. Holloway, Timothy Semple, Ivon Harliwong, Craig Nourse, Ehsan Nourbakhsh, Suzanne Manning, Senel Idrisoglu, Timothy J. C. Bruxner, Angelika N. Christ, Barsha Poudel, Oliver Holmes, Matthew Anderson, Conrad Leonard, Andrew Lonie, Nathan Hall, Scott Wood, Darrin F. Taylor, Qinying Xu, J. Lynn Fink, Nick Waddell, Ronny Drapkin, Euan Stronach, Hani Gabra, Robert Brown, Andrea Jewell, Shivashankar H. Nagaraj, Emma Markham, Peter J. Wilson, Jason Ellul, Orla McNally, Maria A. Doyle, Ravikiran Vedururu, Collin Stewart, Ernst Lengyel, John V. Pearson, Nicola Waddell, Anna deFazio, Sean M. Grimmond, David D. L. Bowtell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Professor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,731,441
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,840
of 90,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,023
of 283,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#832
of 1,131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.