↓ Skip to main content

Fotemustine, teniposide and dexamethasone versus high-dose methotrexate plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: a randomised phase 2 trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Fotemustine, teniposide and dexamethasone versus high-dose methotrexate plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: a randomised phase 2 trial
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2970-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingjing Wu, Lingling Duan, Lei Zhang, Zhenchang Sun, Xiaorui Fu, Xin Li, Ling Li, Xinhua Wang, Xudong Zhang, Zhaoming Li, Hui Yu, Yu Chang, Feifei Nan, Jiaqin Yan, Li Tian, Xiaoli Wang, Mingzhi Zhang

Abstract

This prospective, randomized, controlled and open-label clinical trial sought to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the FTD regimen (fotemustine, teniposide and dexamethasone) compared to HD-MA therapy (high-dose methotrexate plus cytarabine) and to elucidate some biomarkers that influence outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma. Participants were stratified by IELSG risk score (low versus intermediate versus high) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive four cycles of FTD or HD-MA regimen. Both regimens were administered every 3 weeks and were followed by whole-brain radiotherapy. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Between June 2012, and June 2015, 52 patients were enrolled, of whom 49 patients were randomly assigned and analyzed. Of the 49 eligible patients, no significant difference was observed in terms of ORR between FTD (n = 24) and HD-MA (n = 25) groups (88% versus 84%, respectively, P = 0.628). Neither the 2-year PFS nor the 3-year OS rate differed significantly between FTD and HD-MA groups (37% versus 39% for 2-year PFS, P = 0.984; 51% versus 46% for 3-year OS, P = 0.509; respectively). The HD-MA group showed more serious neutropenia (P = 0.009) than the FTD group. High Bcl-6 expression correlated with longer OS (P = 0.038). FTD chemotherapy appeared to be safe and effective for PCNSL patients. High Bcl-6 expression correlated with longer survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Psychology 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,901,776
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,872
of 3,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,076
of 343,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#29
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.