↓ Skip to main content

Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Education and Information Technologies, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review
Published in
Education and Information Technologies, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10639-018-9783-6
Authors

Bimal Aklesh Kumar, Sailesh Saras Chand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Lecturer 26 12%
Student > Master 23 10%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 82 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 37 17%
Social Sciences 32 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 8%
Linguistics 11 5%
Arts and Humanities 9 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 89 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,699,725
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Education and Information Technologies
#724
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,716
of 333,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Education and Information Technologies
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.